<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-22T23:45:59.654185+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98388</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-98388</title>
    <updated>2026-10-22T23:45:59.664595+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>exec: do_close_on_exec() before taking exec_update_lock</p>
<p>do_close_on_exec() currently happens while holding the exec_update_lock,
which is used in a lot of places that access process state to
synchronize access checks.
I recently added another such use of exec_update_lock, causing a
regression.</p>
<p>do_close_on_exec() can block waiting for a reply from a filesystem.
That means a hung filesystem can block codepaths that use
exec_update_lock; and it also means that a FUSE filesystem which
attempts to inspect the calling process can deadlock.</p>
<p>To avoid such problems, move do_close_on_exec() before the
exec_update_lock is taken, but after the FD table has been copied if
necessary.</p>
<p>I have looked through all the calls between the old and new position of
the do_close_on_exec() call; there seems to be no file descriptor table
access in between.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-98388"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-chvx-fr8p-v654</id>
    <title>GHSA-chvx-fr8p-v654</title>
    <updated>2026-10-22T23:45:59.664737+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>exec: do_close_on_exec() before taking exec_update_lock</p>
<p>do_close_on_exec() currently happens while holding the exec_update_lock,
which is used in a lot of places that access process state to
synchronize access checks.
I recently added another such use of exec_update_lock, causing a
regression.</p>
<p>do_close_on_exec() can block waiting for a reply from a filesystem.
That means a hung filesystem can block codepaths that use
exec_update_lock; and it also means that a FUSE filesystem which
attempts to inspect the calling process can deadlock.</p>
<p>To avoid such problems, move do_close_on_exec() before the
exec_update_lock is taken, but after the FD table has been copied if
necessary.</p>
<p>I have looked through all the calls between the old and new position of
the do_close_on_exec() call; there seems to be no file descriptor table
access in between.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-chvx-fr8p-v654"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98388</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2026-98388 — exec: do_close_on_exec() before taking exec_update_lock</title>
    <updated>2026-10-22T23:45:59.664771+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2026-98388</content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-98388"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:12165-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:12165-1 — kernel-devel-7.2.11-1.1 on GA media</title>
    <updated>2026-10-22T23:45:59.664795+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>kernel-devel-7.2.11-1.1 on GA media</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:12165-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98388</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-98388</title>
    <updated>2026-10-22T23:45:59.664826+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 186 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: exec: do_close_on_exec() before taking exec_update_lock do_close_on_exec() currently happens while holding the exec_update_lock, which is used in a lot of places that access process state to synchronize access checks. I recently added another such use of exec_update_lock, causing a regression. do_close_on_exec() can block waiting for a reply from a filesystem. That means a hung filesystem can block codepaths that use exec_update_lock; and it also means that a FUSE filesystem which attempts to inspect the calling process can deadlock. To avoid such problems, move do_close_on_exec() before the exec_update_lock is taken, but after the FD table has been copied if necessary. I have looked through all the calls between the old and new position of the do_close_on_exec() call; there seems to be no file descriptor table access in between.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-98388"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
