<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-30T16:39:45.717950+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-93099</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-93099</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T16:39:45.739871+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>fs/resctrl: Fix UAF from worker threads when domains are removed</p>
<p>The mbm_handle_overflow() and cqm_handle_limbo() workers read event counters
and may sleep while doing so. They are scheduled via delayed_work embedded in
struct rdt_l3_mon_domain. Architecture allocates and frees these domains from
CPU hotplug callbacks under cpus_write_lock(), and the workers acquire
cpus_read_lock() to keep the domain alive across their access.</p>
<p>A use-after-free can occur when a worker is blocked waiting for
cpus_read_lock() while the hotplug core holds cpus_write_lock(): the
architecture frees the rdt_l3_mon_domain that contains the worker's
work_struct. When the worker unblocks, the container_of() it performs on the
embedded work pointer dereferences freed memory.</p>
<p>Drop cpus_read_lock() from the workers and instead drain pending and in-flight
work synchronously before the architecture can free the domain.  Since
architecture offlines the domain under cpus_write_lock() after it has been
unlinked from the RCU list and a grace period has elapsed, no new work can be
scheduled. The cancel only needs to wait out existing work.  Drop
rdtgroup_mutex during CPU offline around cancel_delayed_work_sync() so that
a worker waiting on the mutex can complete before re-pinning the work on
a different CPU.</p>
<p>When offlining a CPU the architecture may iterate over resources in any order.
For example, the MBA control domain may be offlined b…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-93099"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-qpj7-xpxx-33h9</id>
    <title>GHSA-qpj7-xpxx-33h9</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T16:39:45.740023+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:</p>
<p>fs/resctrl: Fix UAF from worker threads when domains are removed</p>
<p>The mbm_handle_overflow() and cqm_handle_limbo() workers read event counters
and may sleep while doing so. They are scheduled via delayed_work embedded in
struct rdt_l3_mon_domain. Architecture allocates and frees these domains from
CPU hotplug callbacks under cpus_write_lock(), and the workers acquire
cpus_read_lock() to keep the domain alive across their access.</p>
<p>A use-after-free can occur when a worker is blocked waiting for
cpus_read_lock() while the hotplug core holds cpus_write_lock(): the
architecture frees the rdt_l3_mon_domain that contains the worker's
work_struct. When the worker unblocks, the container_of() it performs on the
embedded work pointer dereferences freed memory.</p>
<p>Drop cpus_read_lock() from the workers and instead drain pending and in-flight
work synchronously before the architecture can free the domain.  Since
architecture offlines the domain under cpus_write_lock() after it has been
unlinked from the RCU list and a grace period has elapsed, no new work can be
scheduled. The cancel only needs to wait out existing work.  Drop
rdtgroup_mutex during CPU offline around cancel_delayed_work_sync() so that
a worker waiting on the mutex can complete before re-pinning the work on
a different CPU.</p>
<p>When offlining a CPU the architecture may iterate over resources in any order.
For example, the MBA control domain may be offlined b…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-qpj7-xpxx-33h9"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-93099</id>
    <title>msrc_CVE-2026-93099 — fs/resctrl: Fix UAF from worker threads when domains are removed</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T16:39:45.740098+00:00</updated>
    <content>msrc_CVE-2026-93099</content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-93099"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11893-1</id>
    <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11893-1 — kernel-devel-7.2.8-1.1 on GA media</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T16:39:45.740133+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>kernel-devel-7.2.8-1.1 on GA media</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11893-1"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-93099</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-93099</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T16:39:45.740385+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0 and 239 more</p>
<p>In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/resctrl: Fix UAF from worker threads when domains are removed The mbm_handle_overflow() and cqm_handle_limbo() workers read event counters and may sleep while doing so. They are scheduled via delayed_work embedded in struct rdt_l3_mon_domain. Architecture allocates and frees these domains from CPU hotplug callbacks under cpus_write_lock(), and the workers acquire cpus_read_lock() to keep the domain alive across their access. A use-after-free can occur when a worker is blocked waiting for cpus_read_lock() while the hotplug core holds cpus_write_lock(): the architecture frees the rdt_l3_mon_domain that contains the worker's work_struct. When the worker unblocks, the container_of() it performs on the embedded work pointer dereferences freed memory. Drop cpus_read_lock() from the workers and instead drain pending and in-flight work synchronously before the architecture can free the domain.  Since architecture offlines the domain under cpus_write_lock() after it has been unlinked from the RCU list and a grace period has elapsed, no new work can be scheduled. The cancel only needs to wait out existing work.  Drop rdtgroup_mutex during CPU offline around cancel_delayed_work_sync() so that a worker waiting on the mutex can complete before re-pinning the work on a different CPU. When offlining a CPU the architecture may iterate over resources in any order. For example, the MBA control domain may be offlined before…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-93099"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
