<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-30T03:16:57.756193+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-69204</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-69204</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T03:16:57.761275+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Http4s is a Scala interface for HTTP services. Prior to 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47, Ember HTTP/1.1 does not reject messages containing both Transfer-Encoding and Content-Length, so an intermediary and Ember can select different body framing rules. When ember-server is behind a keep-alive intermediary that forwards both headers and frames by Content-Length, an unauthenticated attacker can smuggle a second request, bypass intermediary access controls, poison caches, or cause a victim request to be joined to an attacker-controlled prefix. The shared response parser can also desynchronize an ember-client connection when a malicious or compromised upstream sends both headers. This issue is fixed in versions 0.23.35 and 1.0.0-M47.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-69204"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-8h4c-x2wg-6xp8</id>
    <title>GHSA-8h4c-x2wg-6xp8 — Http4s Ember accepts Transfer-Encoding combined with Content-Length (CL.TE request smuggling)</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T03:16:57.761333+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Maven: org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_2.12, Maven: org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_2.13, Maven: org.http4s:http4s-ember-core_3</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>Ember's HTTP/1.1 request parser does not reject a message that carries both a
`Transfer-Encoding` and a `Content-Length` header. RFC 9112 §6.1 requires a
server to treat such a message as a framing error and close the connection.
An intermediary that follows the RFC's CL-strip-and-forward path (or that
prioritises `Content-Length`) will frame the body differently from Ember,
enabling HTTP request smuggling (CL.TE).</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>### Server</p>
<p>Request smuggling when ember-server is an origin behind an intermediary that
forwards both headers over a keep-alive backend connection and frames by
`Content-Length` while Ember frames by chunked:</p>
<p>- Front-end security bypass: the smuggled request reaches paths the
  intermediary's ACL/auth layer would have blocked, with attacker-chosen
  method and headers.
- Cross-user request hijack: a dangling smuggled prefix concatenates with the
  next victim's request on the shared backend socket, capturing its headers.
- Cache poisoning: the smuggled response is associated with the next request
  key in a caching proxy.</p>
<p>### Client</p>
<p>ember-client shares the same parser on the response path. An upstream that
sends both headers can desync a pooled client connection. This requires a
malicious or compromised upstream.</p>
<p>## Preconditions</p>
<p>- Unauthenticated remote attacker (server)
- ember-server as origin behind a keep-alive intermediary
- Intermediary forwards a request carrying both `Transfer-Encoding` and
  `Content-Length` (RFC says it MAY…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-8h4c-x2wg-6xp8"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
