<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-09-30T21:09:44.976922+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/brew-imap-backup-cve-2026-63435</id>
    <title>BREW-imap-backup-CVE-2026-63435 — Mail: Email address spoofing via malformed RFC 2047 encoded-words</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T21:09:45.056585+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Homebrew: imap-backup</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>Mail::Utilities.q_value_decode and Mail::Utilities.b_value_decode decoded only the first RFC 2047 encoded-word in a string and used an overly greedy pattern to match the charset token. A crafted, malformed encoded-word embedded in an address display name or local part could cause the decoded output to differ from what a human reviewer or downstream parser would expect, allowing an attacker to spoof the apparent sender/recipient address.</p>
<p>## Details</p>
<p>Both decoders used a single String#match against a pattern such as /\=\?(.+)?\?[Qq]\?(.*)\?\=/m. Two problems:</p>
<p>1. Single match, dropped remainder. Only the first =?charset?Q?...?= (or ?B?) word was decoded. Any additional encoded-words or surrounding text were not handled consistently, so the decoded result could silently omit or alter parts of the input.
2. Greedy charset capture. (.+)? is greedy and matches across ? delimiters, so a malformed word could span more of the string than a strict RFC 2047 parse would, changing the boundary between "encoded" and "literal" text.</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>Applications using mail to parse and display or authorize based on decoded header values (From, To, Reply-To, etc.) may present or act on an address different from the one a validator inspecting the raw header would see. Primary risk is spoofing / phishing and authorization-check bypass. No RCE.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/brew-imap-backup-cve-2026-63435"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cleanstart-2026-jd97527</id>
    <title>CLEANSTART-2026-JD97527 — Security fix for CVE-2026-63435 applied in: ruby-fluentd-1.18 1.18.0-r7, ruby-fluentd-1.19 1.19.3-r1</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T21:09:45.056691+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> CleanStart: ruby-fluentd-1.18, CleanStart: ruby-fluentd-1.19</p>
<p>CVE-2026-63435 affects multiple packages. This issue is resolved in later releases. See references for individual vulnerability details.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/cleanstart-2026-jd97527"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-63435</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-63435</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T21:09:45.056718+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Mail is an internet library for Ruby designed to handle email generation, parsing, and sending. Prior to 2.9.1, Mail::Utilities.q_value_decode and Mail::Utilities.b_value_decode used a single String#match and an overly greedy charset capture to decode only the first RFC 2047 encoded-word and mishandle surrounding or subsequent text. A crafted malformed encoded-word in an address display name or local part could cross ? delimiters and make decoded From, To, or Reply-To header values differ from the raw values inspected by a human reviewer or downstream parser, enabling apparent sender or recipient spoofing, phishing, or authorization-check bypass. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.1.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-63435"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-mvxr-6m87-mv2q</id>
    <title>GHSA-mvxr-6m87-mv2q — Mail: Email address spoofing via malformed RFC 2047 encoded-words</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T21:09:45.056750+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> RubyGems: mail</p>
<p>## Summary</p>
<p>Mail::Utilities.q_value_decode and Mail::Utilities.b_value_decode decoded only the first RFC 2047 encoded-word in a string and used an overly greedy pattern to match the charset token. A crafted, malformed encoded-word embedded in an address display name or local part could cause the decoded output to differ from what a human reviewer or downstream parser would expect, allowing an attacker to spoof the apparent sender/recipient address.</p>
<p>## Details</p>
<p>Both decoders used a single String#match against a pattern such as /\=\?(.+)?\?[Qq]\?(.*)\?\=/m. Two problems:</p>
<p>1. Single match, dropped remainder. Only the first =?charset?Q?...?= (or ?B?) word was decoded. Any additional encoded-words or surrounding text were not handled consistently, so the decoded result could silently omit or alter parts of the input.
2. Greedy charset capture. (.+)? is greedy and matches across ? delimiters, so a malformed word could span more of the string than a strict RFC 2047 parse would, changing the boundary between "encoded" and "literal" text.</p>
<p>## Impact</p>
<p>Applications using mail to parse and display or authorize based on decoded header values (From, To, Reply-To, etc.) may present or act on an address different from the one a validator inspecting the raw header would see. Primary risk is spoofing / phishing and authorization-check bypass. No RCE.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-mvxr-6m87-mv2q"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/oesa-2026-4104</id>
    <title>OESA-2026-4104 — rubygem-mail security update</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T21:09:45.056780+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: rubygem-mail</p>
<p>A really Ruby Mail handler.

Security Fix(es):</p>
<p>Affected versions of this package are vulnerable to Improper Validation of Syntactic Correctness of Input through `q_value_decode` and `b_value_decode` in `lib/mail/utilities.rb`. An attacker can make a display name or local part decode to a different address than intended by supplying a malformed RFC 2047 encoded-word, including one that embeds extra encoded-word markers or additional text. The decoders only matched the first encoded-word and used a greedy charset capture, so a crafted header could cause the parsed `From`, `To`, or `Reply-To` value to omit or reshuffle literal text. Applications that display, compare, or authorize based on the decoded address can then present or act on a spoofed sender or recipient address.(CVE-2026-63435)</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/oesa-2026-4104"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-63435</id>
    <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-63435</title>
    <updated>2026-09-30T21:09:45.056804+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: jruby, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: ruby2.3, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: jruby, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: ruby2.5, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: jruby, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: ruby2.7, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: jruby, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: ruby3.0, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: jruby, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: ruby3.2 and 2 more</p>
<p>Mail is an internet library for Ruby designed to handle email generation, parsing, and sending. Prior to 2.9.1, Mail::Utilities.q_value_decode and Mail::Utilities.b_value_decode used a single String#match and an overly greedy charset capture to decode only the first RFC 2047 encoded-word and mishandle surrounding or subsequent text. A crafted malformed encoded-word in an address display name or local part could cross ? delimiters and make decoded From, To, or Reply-To header values differ from the raw values inspected by a human reviewer or downstream parser, enabling apparent sender or recipient spoofing, phishing, or authorization-check bypass. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.1.</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-63435"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
