<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-02T15:00:52.240106+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-43947</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-43947</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T15:00:52.258289+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. Version 1.3.0 has an unauthenticated Remote Code Execution vulnerability when `secureEnabled` is set to `true`. The `POST /api/runscript` endpoint checks authorization against the stored script's permission by ID, but when `test: true` is set in the request, it compiles and executes attacker-supplied code instead of the stored script's code. An unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid script ID and name may execute arbitrary code via test mode if at least one server-side script exists and is accessible without restrictive permissions. Script IDs and names can be obtained through the unauthenticated information disclosure in `GET /api/project` (reported separately). The only prerequisite is that at least one server-side script exists in the project. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-43947"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6</id>
    <title>GHSA-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6 — FUXA Vulnerable to Unauthenticated Remote Code Execution via Script Test Mode Authorization Bypass</title>
    <updated>2026-10-02T15:00:52.258359+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><p><strong>Affected:</strong> npm: fuxa-server</p>
<p>### Summary</p>
<p>An unauthenticated Remote Code Execution vulnerability exists in FUXA when `secureEnabled` is set to `true`. The `POST /api/runscript` endpoint checks authorization against the stored script's permission by ID, but when `test: true` is set in the request, it compiles and executes attacker-supplied code instead of the stored script's code. An unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid script ID and name may execute arbitrary code via test mode if at least one server-side script exists and is accessible without restrictive permissions.</p>
<p>Script IDs and names can be obtained through the unauthenticated information disclosure in `GET /api/project` (reported separately).</p>
<p>The only prerequisite is that at least one server-side script exists in the project.</p>
<p>### Details</p>
<p>**Authorization confused deputy in script execution**</p>
<p>File: `server/runtime/scripts/index.js`, lines 86-103</p>
<p>The authorization check looks up the stored script by ID and validates the stored script's `permission` field:</p>
<p>```javascript
this.isAuthorised = function (_script, permission) {
    const st = scriptModule.getScript(_script);  // finds stored script by _script.id
    if (admin || (st &amp;&amp; (!st.permission || st.permission &amp; permission))) {
        return true;
    }
    return false;
}
```</p>
<p>When a script has no `permission` field set (or `permission: 0`), the expression `!st.permission` evaluates to `true`, and the check passes for any caller including guests.</p>
<p>**Guest auto-authentication in the m…</p></div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-rg3m-cfq7-g6h6"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
