<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-10-16T11:30:28.260297+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1016</id>
    <title>certfr-2026-avi-1016 — Une vulnérabilité a été découverte dans les produits Foxit. Elle permet à un attaquant de provoquer une atteinte à l'in…</title>
    <updated>2026-10-16T11:30:28.280674+00:00</updated>
    <content>certfr-2026-avi-1016</content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1016"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-18622</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2026-18622</title>
    <updated>2026-10-16T11:30:28.280754+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Foxit PDF Editor/Reader inconsistently alerts users when signature fields are abnormally modified, including alterations to appearance, coordinates, or field duplication. This may mislead users into trusting tampered documents, since the UI cannot accurately reflect the actual integrity status of signatures.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-18622"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-9462-v678-qmwm</id>
    <title>GHSA-9462-v678-qmwm</title>
    <updated>2026-10-16T11:30:28.280795+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Foxit PDF Editor/Reader inconsistently alerts users when signature fields are abnormally modified, including alterations to appearance, coordinates, or field duplication. This may mislead users into trusting tampered documents, since the UI cannot accurately reflect the actual integrity status of signatures.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-9462-v678-qmwm"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
