In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/i915/active: Fix misuse of non-idle barriers as fence trackers
Users reported oopses on list corruptions when using i915 perf with a number of concurrently running graphics applications. Root cause analysis pointed at an issue in barrier processing code -- a race among perf open / close replacing active barriers with perf requests on kernel context and concurrent barrier preallocate / acquire operations performed during user context first pin / last unpin.
When adding a request to a composite tracker, we try to reuse an existing fence tracker, already allocated and registered with that composite. The tracker we obtain may already track another fence, may be an idle barrier, or an active barrier.
If the tracker we get occurs a non-idle barrier then we try to delete that barrier from a list of barrier tasks it belongs to. However, while doing that we don't respect return value from a function that performs the barrier deletion. Should the deletion ever fail, we would end up reusing the tracker still registered as a barrier task. Since the same structure field is reused with both fence callback lists and barrier tasks list, list corruptions would likely occur.
Barriers are now deleted from a barrier tasks list by temporarily removing the list content, traversing that content with skip over the node to be deleted, then populating the list back with the modified content. Should that intentionally r…
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
drm/i915/active: Fix misuse of non-idle barriers as fence trackers
Users reported oopses on list corruptions when using i915 perf with a number of concurrently running graphics applications. Root cause analysis pointed at an issue in barrier processing code -- a race among perf open / close replacing active barriers with perf requests on kernel context and concurrent barrier preallocate / acquire operations performed during user context first pin / last unpin.
When adding a request to a composite tracker, we try to reuse an existing fence tracker, already allocated and registered with that composite. The tracker we obtain may already track another fence, may be an idle barrier, or an active barrier.
If the tracker we get occurs a non-idle barrier then we try to delete that barrier from a list of barrier tasks it belongs to. However, while doing that we don't respect return value from a function that performs the barrier deletion. Should the deletion ever fail, we would end up reusing the tracker still registered as a barrier task. Since the same structure field is reused with both fence callback lists and barrier tasks list, list corruptions would likely occur.
Barriers are now deleted from a barrier tasks list by temporarily removing the list content, traversing that content with skip over the node to be deleted, then populating the list back with the modified content. Should that intentionally r…
kernel: seg6: fix the iif in the IPv6 socket control block Kernel: race when faulting a device private page in memory manager kernel: use-after-free in l1oip timer handlers kernel: Rate limit overflow messages in r8152 in intr_callback kernel: vmwgfx: use-after-free in vmw_cmd_res_check kernel: vmwgfx: use-after-free in vmw_execbuf_tie_context hw: Intel: Gather Data Sampling (GDS) side channel vulnerability kernel: Information leak in l2cap_parse_conf_req in net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c kernel: perf: Fix perf_pending_task() UaF kernel: gpiolib: fix memory leak in gpiochip_setup_dev() kernel: memcg: fix possible use-after-free in memcg_write_event_control() kernel: mm/khugepaged: invoke MMU notifiers in shmem/file collapse paths kernel: char: tpm: Protect tpm_pm_suspend with locks kernel: ixgbevf: Fix resource leak in ixgbevf_init_module() kernel: dax: make sure inodes are flushed before destroy cache kernel: watch_queue: Actually free the watch kernel: watch_queue: Fix NULL dereference in error cleanup kernel: rtc: pl031: fix rtc features null pointer dereference kernel: tpm: fix reference counting for struct tpm_chip kernel: NFSv4: Don't hold the layoutget locks across multiple RPC calls kernel: xprtrdma: treat all calls not a bcall when bc_serv is NULL kernel: net: ipv6: unexport __init-annotated seg6_hmac_init() kernel: af_unix: Fix a data-race in unix_dgram_peer_wake_me(). kernel: regulator: scmi: Fix refcount leak in scmi_regulator_probe kernel: mm/mempolicy: fix uninit-v…
Security update for the Linux Kernel
Affected: Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 100 more
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/i915/active: Fix misuse of non-idle barriers as fence trackers Users reported oopses on list corruptions when using i915 perf with a number of concurrently running graphics applications. Root cause analysis pointed at an issue in barrier processing code -- a race among perf open / close replacing active barriers with perf requests on kernel context and concurrent barrier preallocate / acquire operations performed during user context first pin / last unpin. When adding a request to a composite tracker, we try to reuse an existing fence tracker, already allocated and registered with that composite. The tracker we obtain may already track another fence, may be an idle barrier, or an active barrier. If the tracker we get occurs a non-idle barrier then we try to delete that barrier from a list of barrier tasks it belongs to. However, while doing that we don't respect return value from a function that performs the barrier deletion. Should the deletion ever fail, we would end up reusing the tracker still registered as a barrier task. Since the same structure field is reused with both fence callback lists and barrier tasks list, list corruptions would likely occur. Barriers are now deleted from a barrier tasks list by temporarily removing the list content, traversing that content with skip over the node to be deleted, then populating the list back with the modified content. Should that intentionally racy c…