<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/rss/recent/all/10</id>
  <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
  <updated>2026-11-06T05:34:46.384849+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2006-1854</id>
    <title>fkie_cve-2006-1854</title>
    <updated>2026-11-06T05:34:46.412612+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in BluePay Manager 2.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML during a login action via the (1) Account Name and (2) Username field.  NOTE: the vendor has disputed this vulnerability, saying that "it does not exist currently in the Bluepay 2.0 product," and older versions might not have been affected either.  As of 20060512, CVE has not formally investigated this dispute</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/fkie_cve-2006-1854"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-5m99-4jhr-cpmp</id>
    <title>GHSA-5m99-4jhr-cpmp</title>
    <updated>2026-11-06T05:34:46.412692+00:00</updated>
    <content type="xhtml">
      <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>** DISPUTED **  Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in BluePay Manager 2.0 and earlier allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML during a login action via the (1) Account Name and (2) Username field.  NOTE: the vendor has disputed this vulnerability, saying that "it does not exist currently in the Bluepay 2.0 product," and older versions might not have been affected either.  As of 20060512, CVE has not formally investigated this dispute.</p>
      </div>
    </content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/ghsa-5m99-4jhr-cpmp"/>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/gsd-2006-1854</id>
    <title>gsd-2006-1854</title>
    <updated>2026-11-06T05:34:46.412722+00:00</updated>
    <content>gsd-2006-1854</content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/vuln/gsd-2006-1854"/>
  </entry>
</feed>
