<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
  <id>https://db.gcve.eu/comments/feed</id>
  <title>Most recent comments.</title>
  <updated>2026-06-06T07:52:21.071064+00:00</updated>
  <author>
    <name>Vulnerability-Lookup</name>
    <email>info@gcve.eu</email>
  </author>
  <link href="https://db.gcve.eu" rel="alternate"/>
  <generator uri="https://lkiesow.github.io/python-feedgen" version="1.0.0">python-feedgen</generator>
  <subtitle>Contains only the most 10 recent comments.</subtitle>
  <entry>
    <id>https://db.gcve.eu/comment/b2a6b85e-5b0d-4ac4-b7a4-9227e3ff28e0</id>
    <title>SonicWall Firewall Vulnerability Exploited After PoC Publication</title>
    <updated>2026-06-06T07:52:21.074726+00:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>sync_user</name>
      <uri>https://db.gcve.eu/user/sync_user</uri>
    </author>
    <content>Threat actors started exploiting a recent SonicWall firewall vulnerability this week, shortly after proof-of-concept (PoC) code targeting it was published.

According to Bishop Fox, approximately 4,500 internet-facing SonicWall SSL VPN servers had not been patched against CVE-2024-53704 by February 7.</content>
    <link href="https://db.gcve.eu/comment/b2a6b85e-5b0d-4ac4-b7a4-9227e3ff28e0"/>
    <published>2025-02-17T08:57:05.680592+00:00</published>
  </entry>
</feed>
